--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-07 18:03 ---
Ok, that's quite likely.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 33887 ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-07 17:32 ---
A regression hunt on powerpc-linux showed that the test starts passing with:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=131823
r131823 | rguenth | 2008-01-25 12:06:31 + (Fri, 25 Jan 2008)
That's a fix for
--- Comment #5 from bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 16:45 ---
This works for me using latest mainline, but using a compiler built with
revision 131553, it fails. I'll try and see if we're just getting lucky now or
whether it has been fixed since then.
Janis, in the meantime,
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-04 16:49 ---
Still works for me on x86_64/i686. Any ppc guys around to confirm this?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33205
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-28 09:39 ---
This works for me on a x86_64 target.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from xk-corpse at hotmail dot com 2007-08-28 11:25 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
This works for me on a x86_64 target.
For me it works on i686-pc-linux (with cross-compiler, configured with the same
method as above - crosstool-0.43 + glibc-2.3.2), works on i386-mingw32
