[Bug target/3506] weird behaviour when incrementing volatile ints
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3506 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marc.glisse at normalesup dot org --- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 50677 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug target/3506] weird behaviour when incrementing volatile ints
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3506 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paulmckrcu at gmail dot com --- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 96327 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug target/3506] weird behaviour when incrementing volatile ints
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-28 02:48 --- *** Bug 33102 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3506
[Bug target/3506] weird behaviour when incrementing volatile ints
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-18 00:12 --- *** Bug 33102 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3506
[Bug target/3506] weird behaviour when incrementing volatile ints
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-18 00:05 --- *** Bug 33102 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paulmck at linux dot vnet ||dot ibm dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3506
[Bug target/3506] weird behaviour when incrementing volatile ints
--- Additional Comments From mrd at alkemio dot org 2005-05-16 22:34 --- (In reply to comment #5) Mark as invalid. Why? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3506
[Bug target/3506] weird behaviour when incrementing volatile ints
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-16 22:57 --- (In reply to comment #7) (In reply to comment #5) Mark as invalid. Why? Did you read comment #1. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3506
[Bug target/3506] weird behaviour when incrementing volatile ints
--- Additional Comments From mrd at alkemio dot org 2005-05-17 00:33 --- (In reply to comment #8) Did you read comment #1. Yes, but it's not clear. GCC doesn't know what constitutes a reference to a volatile memory Is this to say the GCC developers believe the C language's definition of volatile is ambiguous, or that there are situations where incl x is operationally distinct from movl x, %eax; incl %eax; movl %eax, x when x is volatile? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3506
[Bug target/3506] weird behaviour when incrementing volatile ints
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-15 13:33 --- Reopen to ... -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3506
[Bug target/3506] weird behaviour when incrementing volatile ints
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-15 13:33 --- Mark as invalid. -- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3506
[Bug target/3506] weird behaviour when incrementing volatile ints
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-15 13:34 --- *** Bug 21580 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added CC||mrd at alkemio dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3506
