http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36834
Jackie Rosen jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36834
--- Comment #13 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-18 10:16:16
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Sat Dec 18 10:16:13 2010
New Revision: 168019
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168019
Log:
2010-12-18 Kai Tietz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36834
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Comment #12 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-24 12:05 ---
As I read this. Would it make sense to use for x86-mingw the callabi feature
(as we do for the x64 variant)? This would be useful for 32-bit based multilib
version, too (but this is more a side-note for this).
Kai
--- Comment #11 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
2009-03-23 22:10 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Note that C++ objects need not be larger than 8 bytes to qualify for returning
on the stack (and thus subject to this cleanup problem). Any class with a copy
constructor,
--- Comment #9 from mattias at virtutech dot se 2009-03-21 16:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=17508)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17508action=view)
Functions in libstdc++ returning aggregates 8 bytes
These are the functions in libstdc++ that contain the
--- Comment #10 from mattias at virtutech dot se 2009-03-21 21:49 ---
Note that C++ objects need not be larger than 8 bytes to qualify for returning
on the stack (and thus subject to this cleanup problem). Any class with a copy
constructor, for example, seems to be affected.
Try
--- Comment #7 from mattias at virtutech dot se 2009-03-20 17:16 ---
The proposed patch works for plain C code, but also affects C++. Since
libstdc++ contains code that returns aggregates or calls code that does,
-mms-aggregate-return will make the generated code incompatible with the
--- Comment #8 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-03-21
01:03 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
The proposed patch works for plain C code, but also affects C++. Since
libstdc++ contains code that returns aggregates or calls code that does,
An example, please. The
--- Comment #6 from rogerpack2005 at gmail dot com 2009-03-14 21:14 ---
anybody know if this bug is related to this post?
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=482230
Thanks!
-=roger
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36834
--- Comment #4 from rogerpack2005 at gmail dot com 2009-03-11 11:35 ---
I'd be willing to offer a small bounty for this one. Maybe $50 for an accepted
patch that handles both the caller and callee sides?
The problem seems to be common [1].
Thanks!
-=r
[1]
--- Comment #5 from mattias at virtutech dot se 2009-03-11 12:42 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
http://209.85.173.132/search?q=cache:e7XCjhLwHacJ:luabinaries.luaforge.net/manual.html+http://luabinaries.luaforge.net/manual.html%23LuaBinariesCompatiblehl=enct=clnkcd=1gl=usclient=opera
is
--- Comment #3 from mattias at virtutech dot se 2008-07-18 09:43 ---
Thank you. Should the option be enabled by default on i686-pc-mingw32? Perhaps
not, but it does make good on a previously broken ABI promise.
The test case in that patch only covers the callee, not the caller. The
--- Comment #2 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2008-07-17
08:16 ---
Patch submitted
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg01250.html
Danny
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36834
14 matches
Mail list logo
