--- Comment #13 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
2009-03-09 07:46 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Was this broken in 4.3 compilers? Is it a 4.4 regression?
This is not a new bug in the compiler (the same multiple definition will occur
with 3.4.5) , but an old
--- Comment #12 from nightstrike at gmail dot com 2009-03-09 02:10 ---
Was this broken in 4.3 compilers? Is it a 4.4 regression?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37121
--- Comment #9 from drangon dot mail at gmail dot com 2009-03-07 14:52
---
(In reply to comment #8)
I can't test your precompiled code, because c++ has changed in an incompatible
way. Could you attach a current precompiled version using gcc4.4 of it?
Is the problem still present on
--- Comment #10 from drangon dot mail at gmail dot com 2009-03-07 15:02
---
Created an attachment (id=17413)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17413action=view)
gcc -E output ( gcc 4.4.0 svn 20090307 )
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37121
--- Comment #11 from drangon dot mail at gmail dot com 2009-03-07 15:10
---
Created an attachment (id=17414)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17414action=view)
the output object of thread.o
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37121
--- Comment #8 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-28 17:48 ---
I can't test your precompiled code, because c++ has changed in an incompatible
way. Could you attach a current precompiled version using gcc4.4 of it?
Is the problem still present on 4.4.0 ?
--
--- Comment #7 from drangon dot mail at gmail dot com 2008-09-26 00:33
---
I'm using the win64 native compiler:
E:\codeg++ -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-pc-mingw32
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --host=x86_64-pc-mingw32
--target=x86_64-pc-mi
ngw32 --disable-nls
--- Comment #1 from drangon dot mail at gmail dot com 2008-09-25 04:45
---
Created an attachment (id=16405)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16405action=view)
output of gcc -E
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37121
--- Comment #2 from drangon dot mail at gmail dot com 2008-09-25 04:47
---
Created an attachment (id=16406)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16406action=view)
output of nm, the object is build by gcc -O0
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37121
--- Comment #3 from drangon dot mail at gmail dot com 2008-09-25 04:48
---
Created an attachment (id=16407)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16407action=view)
output of nm, the object is build by gcc -O1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37121
--- Comment #4 from drangon dot mail at gmail dot com 2008-09-25 04:48
---
Created an attachment (id=16408)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16408action=view)
output of objdump, the object is build by gcc -O0
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37121
--- Comment #5 from drangon dot mail at gmail dot com 2008-09-25 04:49
---
Created an attachment (id=16409)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16409action=view)
output of objdump, the object is build by gcc -O1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37121
--- Comment #6 from nightstrike at gmail dot com 2008-09-25 05:00 ---
What is the output of g++ -v?
Are you using the win32 cross compiler, or the win64 native compiler?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37121
13 matches
Mail list logo
