[Bug target/38130] [4.4 regression]__builtin_alloca (vs IRA?) testsuite failures on mingw32

2008-11-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-18 12:34 --- Subject: Bug 38130 Author: jakub Date: Tue Nov 18 12:33:38 2008 New Revision: 141965 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=141965 Log: PR target/38130 * config/i386/i386.md

[Bug target/38130] [4.4 regression]__builtin_alloca (vs IRA?) testsuite failures on mingw32

2008-11-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-18 12:37 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/38130] [4.4 regression]__builtin_alloca (vs IRA?) testsuite failures on mingw32

2008-11-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-17 09:21 --- Web pass changes: (insn 14 13 16 2 920929-1.c:5 (parallel [ (set (reg:SI 70) (unspec_volatile:SI [ (reg:SI 70) ] 1)) (set (reg/f:SI 7

[Bug target/38130] [4.4 regression]__builtin_alloca (vs IRA?) testsuite failures on mingw32

2008-11-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38130

[Bug target/38130] [4.4 regression]__builtin_alloca (vs IRA?) testsuite failures on mingw32

2008-11-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-17 22:12 --- Created an attachment (id=16712) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16712action=view) gcc44-pr38130.patch This patch fixes the testcase from quick look at generated assembly. Could anybody please

[Bug target/38130] [4.4 regression]__builtin_alloca (vs IRA?) testsuite failures on mingw32

2008-11-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-17 22:28 --- Created an attachment (id=16713) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16713action=view) gcc44-pr38130.patch I've talked about this with Honza on IRC: honza I would just use 0 constraint. At least in old

[Bug target/38130] [4.4 regression]__builtin_alloca (vs IRA?) testsuite failures on mingw32

2008-11-17 Thread dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #5 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2008-11-18 05:55 --- (In reply to comment #4) Created an attachment (id=16713) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16713action=view) [edit] gcc44-pr38130.patch I've talked about this with Honza on IRC:

[Bug target/38130] [4.4 regression]__builtin_alloca (vs IRA?) testsuite failures on mingw32

2008-11-16 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-16 09:03 --- This problem exists also for x86_64 based mingw. -- ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/38130] [4.4 regression]__builtin_alloca (vs IRA?) testsuite failures on mingw32

2008-11-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |