--- Comment #9 from shadow2531 at gmail dot com 2009-04-02 07:24 ---
Filed tdm bug:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2726299group_id=200665atid=974439
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39530
--- Comment #10 from tdragon at tdragon dot net 2009-04-02 23:57 ---
This is the exact same behavior as is present in the most recent MinGW stable
release of GCC (3.4.5-20060117-3), and will be present in any release which
uses Danny's
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-01 09:00 ---
__gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler hasn't been called then,
doesn't the mingw runtime override __cxxabiv1::__terminate_handler
or the unwinding on mingw not call std::terminate at all?
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-01 09:24 ---
Sure (assuming the weirdo message after it is M$ abort verbiage).
The question is if the reporter sees it as well and if not, why.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39530
--- Comment #5 from shadow2531 at gmail dot com 2009-04-01 09:30 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'
what(): ouch
Yes, this is the part that's missing for me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39530
--- Comment #6 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-01 10:44 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #3)
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'
what(): ouch
Yes, this is the part that's missing for me.
Well, as far as I verified
--- Comment #3 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-01 09:18 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
__gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler hasn't been called then,
doesn't the mingw runtime override __cxxabiv1::__terminate_handler
or the unwinding on mingw not call std::terminate at all?
--- Comment #7 from shadow2531 at gmail dot com 2009-04-01 12:15 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #3)
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'
what(): ouch
Yes, this is the part that's missing for me.
--- Comment #8 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-04-02
04:20 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #3)
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'
what(): ouch
Yes, this is the part that's missing for me.
With
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[regression] runtime_error |[4.3/4.4/4.5 regression]
|text not shown
10 matches
Mail list logo