[Bug target/41531] -O1 -fschedule-insns swscale error
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-01 06:55 --- x86_64 and x86 has issues with pre-RA scheduling pass because of register requirements of the target. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 24319 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c |target Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41531
[Bug target/41531] -O1 -fschedule-insns swscale error
--- Comment #3 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2009-10-01 13:19 --- This is not the same problem as 24319. Vlad thinks he fixed 24319, and indeed the problem in this bug report from 4.4 is gone. The reported problem in 4.5 is different. Don't turn 234319 into a grab bag of any problem that arises when using -fschedule-insns. And, again, I can't reopen this bug. Brad -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41531
[Bug target/41531] -O1 -fschedule-insns swscale error
--- Comment #4 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-10-01 16:28 --- (In reply to comment #3) This is not the same problem as 24319. Vlad thinks he fixed 24319, and indeed the problem in this bug report from 4.4 is gone. The reported problem in 4.5 is different. Don't turn 234319 into a grab bag of any problem that arises when using -fschedule-insns. And, again, I can't reopen this bug. OK, ok, lets' reopen this PR and leave to Vlad to decide. BTW: The test doesn't fail for x86_64-linux with or without -m32. Annoying. -- ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41531
[Bug target/41531] -O1 -fschedule-insns swscale error
--- Comment #5 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-10-01 16:59 --- (In reply to comment #3) This is not the same problem as 24319. Vlad thinks he fixed 24319, and indeed the problem in this bug report from 4.4 is gone. The reported problem in 4.5 is different. Oh, I have noticed that 4.5 has different problem, involving assembler errors. From attached assembler: /APP # 912 swscale_template.c 1 lea 11*8+4*4*256(%rdi), %rdx stuff deleted ... cmp %r15d, %rax more stuff deleted ... jb 1b # 0 2 /NO_APP This simply means invalid asm constraints or operand prefixes in asm. Thus, WONTFIX for 4.4 and INVALID for 4.5. -- ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41531
