[Bug target/41930] [4.5 regression] cc1 SEGV compiling maxval_r16.c

2009-11-04 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
--- Comment #1 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2009-11-04 17:52 --- Subject: [4.5 regression] cc1 SEGV compiling maxval_r16.c Unfortunately, gdb 7.0 crashes as well, so I cannot investigate the problem this way. But I've been able to produce a minimized testcase, which

[Bug target/41930] [4.5 regression] cc1 SEGV compiling maxval_r16.c

2009-11-04 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-04 17:53 --- Created an attachment (id=18968) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18968action=view) minimized testcase Compile with gcc -std=c99 -c -O2 to produce SEGV. --

[Bug target/41930] [4.5 regression] cc1 SEGV compiling maxval_r16.c

2009-11-04 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2009-11-04 18:15 --- Subject: Re: [4.5 regression] cc1 SEGV compiling maxval_r16.c I'll build a cross compiler from i386-pc-solaris2.10 and see if I can reproduce the problem there. Unfortunately, the problem does not

[Bug target/41930] [4.5 regression] cc1 SEGV compiling maxval_r16.c

2009-11-04 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-04 18:32 --- Richard, this may be due to your patch. -- ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/41930] [4.5 regression] cc1 SEGV compiling maxval_r16.c

2009-11-04 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2009-11-04 18:34 --- Subject: Re: [4.5 regression] cc1 SEGV compiling maxval_r16.c Unfortunately, the problem does not reproduce in such a cross compiler, so I'll have to either start a native reghunt or find a way to debug