--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-19 12:07
---
Created an attachment (id=21834)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21834action=view)
More reduced testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43297
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-19 12:16
---
Fixed in latest 4.4.x snapshot:
ebotca...@grobluk:~$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: /home/ebotcazou/src-4.4/configure
--prefix=/home/ebotcazou/install-4.4
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-18 08:48
---
Investigating.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.4.4 |4.4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43297
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-09 12:30 ---
Please test a more recent version from the 4.4 branch (and trunk if possible).
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from edwintorok at gmail dot com 2010-03-09 13:01 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Please test a more recent version from the 4.4 branch (and trunk if possible).
Ok, I found gcc 4.4.3 on gcc200 and it still produces wrong code:
$ /opt/cfarm/release/4.4.3/bin/gcc -v
Using
