[Bug target/43727] undefined reference to `_restgpr_30_x'

2010-04-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-13 12:34 --- I can reproduce it. /tmp g++ -Os -shared -o libhello.so -Wl,-z,defs -fPIC hello.c -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=g++ COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc64-suse-linux/4.5/lto-wrapper Target:

[Bug target/43727] undefined reference to `_restgpr_30_x'

2010-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-13 12:43 --- Is the libgcc_s.so the link finds a linker script? You can use -Wl,-M,--verbose to see what is going on. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43727

[Bug target/43727] undefined reference to `_restgpr_30_x'

2010-04-13 Thread marcus at jet dot franken dot de
--- Comment #8 from marcus at jet dot franken dot de 2010-04-13 14:08 --- $ file /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc64-suse-linux/4.5/libgcc_s.so /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc64-suse-linux/4.5/libgcc_s.so: symbolic link to `/lib/libgcc_s.so.1' $ file /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1: ELF 32-bit MSB

[Bug target/43727] undefined reference to `_restgpr_30_x'

2010-04-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-13 14:10 --- (In reply to comment #7) Is the libgcc_s.so the link finds a linker script? You can use -Wl,-M,--verbose to see what is going on. No, it doesn't seem to. START GROUP LOAD /lib/libc.so.6 LOAD

[Bug target/43727] undefined reference to `_restgpr_30_x'

2010-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-13 14:18 --- Yes, we sometimes install linker scripts, sometimes symbolic links. E.g. on powerpc64-linux, 32-bit libgcc_s.so is a linker script, while 64-bit libgcc_s.so is a symlink. If you after install overwrite it with a

[Bug target/43727] undefined reference to `_restgpr_30_x'

2010-04-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-13 14:30 --- So, my fault. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/43727] undefined reference to `_restgpr_30_x'

2010-04-12 Thread marcus at jet dot franken dot de
--- Comment #1 from marcus at jet dot franken dot de 2010-04-12 15:04 --- Created an attachment (id=20366) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20366action=view) hello.c g++ -Os -shared -o libhello.so -Wl,-z,defs -fPIC hello.c --

[Bug target/43727] undefined reference to `_restgpr_30_x'

2010-04-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-12 15:16 --- Nathan, you touched the relevant code last. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/43727] undefined reference to `_restgpr_30_x'

2010-04-12 Thread froydnj at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from froydnj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-12 15:27 --- This should have been taken care of by: 2009-09-09 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com * config/t-slibgcc-elf-ver (SHLIB_MAKE_SOLINK, SHLIB_INSTALL_SOLINK): New variables. (SHLIB_LINK,

[Bug target/43727] undefined reference to `_restgpr_30_x'

2010-04-12 Thread froydnj at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from froydnj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-12 15:41 --- FWIW, I cannot reproduce with 'gcc version 4.5.0 20100205'. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43727

[Bug target/43727] undefined reference to `_restgpr_30_x'

2010-04-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43727

[Bug target/43727] undefined reference to `_restgpr_30_x'

2010-04-12 Thread marcus at jet dot franken dot de
--- Comment #5 from marcus at jet dot franken dot de 2010-04-12 20:25 --- gcc version 4.5.0 20100331 (experimental) [trunk revision 157870] (SUSE Linux) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43727