http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.3 |4.5.4
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290
--- Comment #32 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-10
10:27:30 UTC ---
Backporting regression fixes is generally fine and does not require explicit
approval (given that the patches do not need significant changes).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290
--- Comment #31 from Jie Zhang jiez at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-21 04:16:19
UTC ---
Patch for 4.5 was posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg01351.html
Waiting for approval.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.2 |4.5.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290
Serge Belyshev belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290
Serge Belyshev belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290
Serge Belyshev belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290
--- Comment #29 from Jie Zhang jiez at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-16 03:05:53
UTC ---
Serge, yes. But GCC 4.5 branch is frozen now again.
--- Comment #21 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 14:48 ---
Subject: Bug 44290
Author: jiez
Date: Fri Jul 23 14:47:46 2010
New Revision: 162466
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162466
Log:
PR target/44290
* attribs.c (decl_attributes):
--- Comment #22 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 14:51 ---
Should be fixed on trunk now.
--
jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #23 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 14:52 ---
Set the status to FIXED.
--
jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #20 from raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2010-05-30 06:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=20777)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20777action=view)
includes fix for all arms
I see the problem after reading Richard's comment #10, here is some more
additions to
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-29 14:45
---
(In reply to comment #13)
(In reply to comment #10)
Or rather, if you have
void __attribute__((naked)) foo (int i)
{
asm(use i);
}
without any inputs refering to i that is invalid.
Not
--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-29 14:46
---
And CC a arm maintainer. There might be more target-specific attributes that
need adjustment.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-05-29 14:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=20772)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20772action=view)
test case from copypage-xscale.c
This is distilled from the kernel's copypage-xscale.c file and illustrates the
--- Comment #18 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-05-29 18:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=20773)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20773action=view)
linux kernel workaround for attribute naked breakage
This patch makes the Linux kernel add noinline and noclone
--- Comment #19 from raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2010-05-30 05:58 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Created an attachment (id=20773)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20773action=view) [edit]
linux kernel workaround for attribute naked breakage
This patch makes the
20 matches
Mail list logo
