http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
--- Comment #24 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-07 10:50:40 UTC ---
Author: amker
Date: Fri Sep 7 10:50:35 2012
New Revision: 191067
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191067
Log:
Backport from 2012-09-04 mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
--- Comment #25 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-07 11:01:02 UTC ---
Author: amker
Date: Fri Sep 7 11:00:52 2012
New Revision: 191068
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191068
Log:
Backport from 2012-09-04 mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
--- Comment #22 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 10:50:00 UTC ---
Author: amker
Date: Wed Sep 5 10:49:56 2012
New Revision: 190970
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190970
Log:
Backport from 2012-09-04 mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
--- Comment #23 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 10:54:11 UTC ---
Author: amker
Date: Wed Sep 5 10:54:08 2012
New Revision: 190971
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190971
Log:
Backport from 2012-09-04 mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
--- Comment #20 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04 09:36:48 UTC ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Sep 4 09:36:44 2012
New Revision: 190919
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190919
Log:
PR target/45070
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #19 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-14 14:05
---
Fixed in all maintained releases.
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 09:26
---
(In reply to comment #16)
I'd like it backported to 4.4 if possible, thanks
Just awaiting approval on the mailing list. It's ready to go.
--
ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #18 from ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 11:07
---
Subject: Bug 45070
Author: ibolton
Date: Tue Sep 7 11:07:31 2010
New Revision: 163945
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163945
Log:
2010-09-07 Ian Bolton ian.bol...@arm.com
Backport
--- Comment #16 from armin76 at gentoo dot org 2010-09-04 16:41 ---
I'd like it backported to 4.4 if possible, thanks
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
--- Comment #15 from ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 13:05
---
Subject: Bug 45070
Author: ibolton
Date: Thu Sep 2 13:05:30 2010
New Revision: 163774
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163774
Log:
2010-09-02 Ian Bolton ian.bol...@arm.com
Backport
--- Comment #14 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-19 08:28 ---
Subject: Bug 45070
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Aug 19 08:27:59 2010
New Revision: 163367
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163367
Log:
For Ian Bolton ian.bol...@arm.com
2010-08-19 Ian Bolton
--- Comment #12 from armin76 at gentoo dot org 2010-08-14 15:33 ---
Any news? :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
--- Comment #13 from siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com 2010-08-14
16:28 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Any news? :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg00894.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
--- Comment #11 from ian dot bolton at arm dot com 2010-08-03 17:13 ---
I have regression-tested the patch for gcc and g++ with target=arm-eabi and
created a regression testsuite case for it, so I expect to be able to submit
both to the mailing list for review in the next day or so.
--- Comment #6 from siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com 2010-07-28
08:37 ---
'arm_size_return_regs()' returns 2 when generating epilogue for 'next' function
here. And as a result, return value not registered in the mask, causing it to
be clobbered.
Would the following patch be the
--- Comment #7 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-28 09:01 ---
Thanks for the analysis, yes that appears to be the nub of the problem with the
result being removed . I see the same problem on trunk -
Patches should however be submitted to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org after
--- Comment #8 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-28 09:22 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Thanks for the analysis, yes that appears to be the nub of the problem with
the
result being removed . I see the same problem on trunk -
I just realized that this is a packed
--- Comment #9 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-28 09:34
---
(In reply to comment #8)
I just realized that this is a packed structure and probably need to look up
the semantics of this in the AAPCS. IIRC the AAPCS states that it doesn't
support packed structures or
--- Comment #10 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-07-28 09:45 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
I just realized that this is a packed structure and probably need to look up
the semantics of this in the AAPCS. IIRC the AAPCS states that it doesn't
support packed structures or bitfields
20 matches
Mail list logo
