http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45094
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45094
--- Comment #13 from Yao Qi 2010-12-28 01:48:51 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Is that first hunk intentional?
No. It is from another PR backport, so it is redundant here. Submit a clean
patch again http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45094
Ryan Hill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #12 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45094
--- Comment #11 from Yao Qi 2010-12-27 08:35:21 UTC
---
Patch to backport it to 4.5 is here
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg01858.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45094
--- Comment #10 from Siarhei Siamashka
2010-12-18 15:47:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> see the link in comment 1
Sorry, I mean the link in the original report from Akos:
http://repo.or.cz/w/official-gcc.git/commitdiff/f1225f6f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45094
--- Comment #9 from Siarhei Siamashka
2010-12-18 15:43:39 UTC ---
Can this bug get a "[4.5 regression]" header please?
Even though the bug existed in gcc sources since 2007 (see the link in comment
1), the reported wrong-code problem itself was
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45094
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.2 |4.5.3
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guen
--- Comment #7 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-27 12:14 ---
can this be backported to the 4.5 branch please ?
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from qiyao at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-18 12:34 ---
Subject: Bug 45094
Author: qiyao
Date: Wed Aug 18 12:33:43 2010
New Revision: 163338
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163338
Log:
gcc/
PR target/45094
* config/arm/arm.c (output_m
--- Comment #5 from qiyao at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-02 00:38 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> > Post patch here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg1.html
>
> + output_asm_insn ("strr%?\t%H0, [%1, #4]", otherops);
>
> s/strr/str/ ?
>
Right, it is a typo
--- Comment #4 from akos dot pasztory at gmail dot com 2010-08-01 11:18
---
> Post patch here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg1.html
+ output_asm_insn ("strr%?\t%H0, [%1, #4]", otherops);
s/strr/str/ ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
--- Comment #3 from qiyao at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-01 08:44 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created an attachment (id=21327)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21327&action=view) [edit]
> simplified testcase
Update this test case a little bit, with test commands.
P
--- Comment #2 from siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com 2010-07-27
20:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=21327)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21327&action=view)
simplified testcase
Confirmed with gcc 4.5.0 here. Also tried but could not reproduce the problem
with
--- Comment #1 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-27 12:47 ---
Patches should be submitted to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org after having been
regression tested. Please also submit a testcase and appropriate Changelog
entries as documented here - http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#patc
14 matches
Mail list logo
