http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P5 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #30 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-13 10:06:11 UTC ---
This will probably fix it:
...
Index: Makefile.in
===
--- Makefile.in (revision 195997)
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #31 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-13
10:09:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
--- Makefile.in (revision 195997)
+++ Makefile.in (working copy)
@@ -115,8 +115,8 @@
touch stamp-libada
-rm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #32 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-13 10:19:35
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Feb 13 10:19:26 2013
New Revision: 196002
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196002
Log:
PR target/52122
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #33 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-13 10:20:49
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Feb 13 10:20:30 2013
New Revision: 196003
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196003
Log:
PR target/52122
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #34 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-13 10:21:35
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Feb 13 10:21:25 2013
New Revision: 196004
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196004
Log:
PR target/52122
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #35 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-13 10:25:21 UTC ---
Kai,
* Makefile.in (LN_S_RECUSIVE): New.
please fix up the log messages.
Thanks,
- Tom
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #36 from Andris Pavenis andris.pavenis at iki dot fi 2013-02-14
04:25:17 UTC ---
This way does not work for DJGPP v2.03 (version v2.04pre is OK).
For DJGPP v2.03:
AC_PROG_LN_S tries 'ln -s', which do not work, after that it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #15 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-12 15:32:15
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Feb 12 15:32:01 2013
New Revision: 195980
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195980
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #16 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-12 15:37:09
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Feb 12 15:36:56 2013
New Revision: 195981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195981
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #17 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-12 15:39:07
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Feb 12 15:38:57 2013
New Revision: 195982
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195982
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #19 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-02-12 17:51:13 UTC ---
This breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin10:
...
test -f stamp-libada || \
make -C ../.././gcc/ada MAKEOVERRIDES= LDFLAGS= LN_S=ln
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #20 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-12 18:02:56
UTC ---
Hmm,
why is NS_RECURSIVE for you an empty? It should become either cp -pR, or be
equal to content of LN_S.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #21 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-12 18:04:53
UTC ---
LN_S_RECURSIVE I mean.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #22 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-02-12 18:07:16 UTC ---
why is NS_RECURSIVE for you an empty? It should become either cp -pR, or be
equal to content of LN_S.
No idea. For a successfull bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #23 from Karlson2k k2k at narod dot ru 2013-02-12 18:11:09 UTC ---
Try to use LN_S_RECURSIVE:= instead of LN_S_RECURSIVE=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-12
18:41:37 UTC ---
Can you please try the following?
echo Makefile \EOF
LN_S=cp -p
ifeq (cp -p,$(LN_S))
LN_S_RECURSIVE=cp -pr
else
LN_S_RECURSIVE=$(LN_S)
endif
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #25 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-02-12 19:14:45 UTC ---
Can you please try the following?
...
Works for me just fine. Perhaps you have buggy make?
Is this working?
[macbook] f90/bug% cat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-12
19:49:34 UTC ---
Yes. Then I have no idea why it doesn't work for you during bootstrap.
Stick some echo ln_s $(LN_S) ln_s_recursive $(LN_S_RECURSIVE) into the targets
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #27 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-02-12 20:16:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
Try to use LN_S_RECURSIVE:= instead of LN_S_RECURSIVE=
As in
--- ../_clean/libada/Makefile.in2013-02-12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
Evgeny Grin karlson2k at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||karlson2k
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #13 from Evgeny Grin karlson2k at gmail dot com 2013-02-08
17:28:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 29398
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29398
Patch for all needed files for cp -pR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 09:51:45
UTC ---
Created attachment 29176
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29176
Patch for using recursive copy for directories.
AFAIU we are talking
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #9 from Daniel Starke daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de
2012-09-24 16:55:33 UTC ---
The problem in autoconf was fixed with version 2.69. I suggest to update
AC_PREREQ within the configure.ac files to this version.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #10 from Daniel Starke daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de
2012-09-24 16:57:53 UTC ---
Here is the reference to the autoconf change:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Starke daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de
2012-09-22 16:00:03 UTC ---
It seems to be partly a gcc autoconfig macro issue. Seeing the following in
gcc/acinclude.m4
dnl See if symbolic links work and if not, try
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
Andris Pavenis andris.pavenis at iki dot fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
tim.vanholder at anubex dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tim.vanholder at anubex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Starke daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de
2012-04-26 18:06:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 27249
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27249
possible patch for gcc 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Starke daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de
2012-04-26 18:07:37 UTC ---
The mailinglist discussion covers only a part of the problem. I have attached a
possible patch for gcc 4.7.0 to highlight to problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Starke daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de
2012-04-05 16:14:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Please update this bug with respect to the mailing list discussion that took
place.
Can you please add a link to the
37 matches
Mail list logo
