http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52479
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52479
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21 20:24:59
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Wed Mar 21 20:24:41 2012
New Revision: 185617
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185617
Log:
PR target/52479
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52479
--- Comment #3 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-16
03:21:08 UTC ---
There is no concrete definition of -ffast-math and users will have
different expectations. Numerical programs for astrodynamics may
expect precisions even
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52479
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-15
04:47:07 UTC ---
IMHO, the whole point of -ffast-math is to trade precision for speed, so the
use of fsca makes sense to me, but I wouldn't mind if we no longer used it for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52479
Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc
