[Bug target/53988] [SH] tst Rm,Rn not used for QI/HImode

2015-03-10 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988 --- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: olegendo Date: Tue Mar 10 08:09:56 2015 New Revision: 221305 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221305root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/53988 * config/sh/sh.md

[Bug target/53988] [SH] tst Rm,Rn not used for QI/HImode

2015-03-10 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988 --- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: olegendo Date: Tue Mar 10 08:17:31 2015 New Revision: 221307 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221307root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/53988 * config/sh/sh.md

[Bug target/53988] [SH] tst Rm,Rn not used for QI/HImode

2015-03-10 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988 Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/53988] [SH] tst Rm,Rn not used for QI/HImode

2015-01-19 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988 --- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: olegendo Date: Mon Jan 19 22:35:53 2015 New Revision: 219864 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219864root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/53988 *

[Bug target/53988] [SH] tst Rm,Rn not used for QI/HImode

2015-01-14 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988 --- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: olegendo Date: Wed Jan 14 23:46:34 2015 New Revision: 219623 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219623root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/53988 *

[Bug target/53988] [SH] tst Rm,Rn not used for QI/HImode

2014-12-29 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988 Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last

[Bug target/53988] [SH] tst Rm,Rn not used for QI/HImode

2012-11-05 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988 Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/53988] [SH] tst Rm,Rn not used for QI/HImode

2012-10-31 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988 --- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-31 22:08:42 UTC --- There was a typo in the PR number when committing the patch for this issue. This is the original commit message that accidentally ended up in PR 54988:

[Bug target/53988] [SH] tst Rm,Rn not used for QI/HImode

2012-09-03 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988 --- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-03 10:01:46 UTC --- Omitting the sign/zero extensions is not safe for calculated QImode / HImode values, only after the extending loads. However, I guess it would still be a