[Bug target/56484] [4.8 Regression] ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1268

2013-03-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56484 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 11:06:26 UTC --- Actually, looking more at this, I'd say combiner is innocent here, the problem is earlier , during ce1 pass, which transforms: 16: ax:SI=call

[Bug target/56484] [4.8 Regression] ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1268

2013-03-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56484 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/56484] [4.8 Regression] ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1268

2013-03-01 Thread venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56484 --- Comment #5 from Venkataramanan venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com 2013-03-01 08:42:42 UTC --- -fno-tree-coalesce-vars for workarround

[Bug target/56484] [4.8 Regression] ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1268

2013-03-01 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56484 --- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-03-01 18:06:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) and the combiner combines the r60 = flags = 0 ? ax : r59 instruction with r59 = r60 into r59 = flags = 0 ? ax : r59