[Bug target/57119] libstdc++-6.dll missed in default gcc 4.8 build

2015-02-10 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug target/57119] libstdc++-6.dll missed in default gcc 4.8 build

2013-12-05 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119 --- Comment #14 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Does this problem still exists for you with current 4.7 branch? For me recent bootstrap multilib 64-bit, and 32-bit are working without issues on 4.7.x

[Bug target/57119] libstdc++-6.dll missed in default gcc 4.8 build

2013-12-05 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119 --- Comment #15 from Dongsheng Song dongsheng.song at gmail dot com --- gcc 4.7.x never have such issue. for gcc 4.8.x or trunk, I did not build multilib long ago. because I can not build multilib which x64 use SEH, and x86 use SJLJ. I must build

[Bug target/57119] libstdc++-6.dll missed in default gcc 4.8 build

2013-04-30 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/57119] libstdc++-6.dll missed in default gcc 4.8 build

2013-04-30 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/57119] libstdc++-6.dll missed in default gcc 4.8 build

2013-04-30 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119 --- Comment #3 from Dongsheng Song dongsheng.song at gmail dot com 2013-04-30 10:42:21 UTC --- Created attachment 29979 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29979 x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/config.log

[Bug target/57119] libstdc++-6.dll missed in default gcc 4.8 build

2013-04-30 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119 --- Comment #4 from Dongsheng Song dongsheng.song at gmail dot com 2013-04-30 10:44:03 UTC --- Created attachment 29980 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29980 gcc/config.log

[Bug target/57119] libstdc++-6.dll missed in default gcc 4.8 build

2013-04-30 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119 --- Comment #5 from Dongsheng Song dongsheng.song at gmail dot com 2013-04-30 10:46:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Hmm, I can't reproduce that. I just built things myself again for 4.8.1 gcc. I am a bit curious to read that due

[Bug target/57119] libstdc++-6.dll missed in default gcc 4.8 build

2013-04-30 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119 Dongsheng Song dongsheng.song at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug target/57119] libstdc++-6.dll missed in default gcc 4.8 build

2013-04-30 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug target/57119] libstdc++-6.dll missed in default gcc 4.8 build

2013-04-30 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119 --- Comment #8 from Dongsheng Song dongsheng.song at gmail dot com 2013-04-30 11:29:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) Hmm, only issue I see is the use of '--disable-nls' option, which is known to cause issue. See here PR 54659.

[Bug target/57119] libstdc++-6.dll missed in default gcc 4.8 build

2013-04-30 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119 --- Comment #9 from Dongsheng Song dongsheng.song at gmail dot com 2013-04-30 11:41:29 UTC --- Created attachment 29981 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29981 gcc/config-v2.log

[Bug target/57119] libstdc++-6.dll missed in default gcc 4.8 build

2013-04-30 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119 --- Comment #10 from Dongsheng Song dongsheng.song at gmail dot com 2013-04-30 11:42:27 UTC --- Created attachment 29982 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29982 i686-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/config-v2.log

[Bug target/57119] libstdc++-6.dll missed in default gcc 4.8 build

2013-04-30 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119 --- Comment #11 from Dongsheng Song dongsheng.song at gmail dot com 2013-04-30 11:43:42 UTC --- Please see gcc/config-v2.log and i686-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/config-v2.log, still not build libstdc++-6.dll

[Bug target/57119] libstdc++-6.dll missed in default gcc 4.8 build

2013-04-30 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119 --- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-30 13:49:25 UTC --- Hmm, I don't see in config.log any difference to the variant I have built on my box. Shared is actual enabled in you config.log for libstdc++-v3. So DLL

[Bug target/57119] libstdc++-6.dll missed in default gcc 4.8 build

2013-04-30 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119 --- Comment #13 from Dongsheng Song dongsheng.song at gmail dot com 2013-04-30 14:46:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) Hmm, I don't see in config.log any difference to the variant I have built on my box. Shared is actual enabled in