https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63347
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|bernds at codesourcery dot com |law at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63347
--- Comment #15 from Jeffrey A. Law law at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: law
Date: Wed Feb 11 23:29:11 2015
New Revision: 220632
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220632root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/63347
* haifa-sched.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63347
--- Comment #13 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ugh, I see. I think the old method of just advancing should work with c6x -
IIRC SCHED_GROUP_P isn't used there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63347
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Right. I know we've got the SCHED_GROUP_P handling in prune_ready_list, but
it's not sufficient.
This is a regression with the trunk.
Take the code from c#0 and run it through a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63347
Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc
