https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'd say it is a bug in the backend, if you want to override some expansion,
you'd better add some target hook for that, rather than messing up with
MOVE_BY_PIECES and setting it to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679
--- Comment #30 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, belagod at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679
--- Comment #29 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679
--- Comment #27 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We'd want to scalarize this early preferably in SRA as it gives a chance to
passes like vectorization to vectorize more loops. I checked that
sra-max-scalarization-Osize{-Ospeed}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679
--- Comment #28 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, belagod at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679
--- Comment #27 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679
--- Comment #29 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #28)
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, belagod at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679
--- Comment #27
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5.0 Regression][AArch64] |[5
