[Bug target/64460] ARM ICE on valid code

2015-02-09 Thread collison at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460 --- Comment #13 from collison at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: collison Date: Tue Feb 10 07:53:23 2015 New Revision: 220570 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220570root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-02-10 Michael Collison michael.colli...@linaro.org

[Bug target/64460] ARM ICE on valid code

2015-01-14 Thread joel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460 Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/64460] ARM ICE on valid code

2015-01-14 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460 --- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Joel, can you try trunk after this commit to confirm that it fixes the ICE on your end and close this off if ok? Thanks, Kyrill

[Bug target/64460] ARM ICE on valid code

2015-01-14 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460 --- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Wed Jan 14 10:14:23 2015 New Revision: 219583 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219583root=gccview=rev Log: [ARM] Fix PR target/64460: Set 'shift' attr properly on

[Bug target/64460] ARM ICE on valid code

2015-01-14 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460 --- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Joel Sherrill from comment #8) (In reply to ktkachov from comment #7) I guess the testcase is flaky. I've posted the patch to fix the ICE and the reasoning behind it at

[Bug target/64460] ARM ICE on valid code

2015-01-12 Thread joel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460 --- Comment #6 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #5) (In reply to Joel Sherrill from comment #4) (In reply to ktkachov from comment #3) I have a fix in the works. The bug is down to the shift

[Bug target/64460] ARM ICE on valid code

2015-01-12 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460 --- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- I guess the testcase is flaky. I've posted the patch to fix the ICE and the reasoning behind it at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg00686.html

[Bug target/64460] ARM ICE on valid code

2015-01-12 Thread joel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460 --- Comment #8 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #7) I guess the testcase is flaky. I've posted the patch to fix the ICE and the reasoning behind it at

[Bug target/64460] ARM ICE on valid code

2015-01-09 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Joel Sherrill from comment #4) (In reply to ktkachov from comment #3) I have a fix in the works. The bug is down to the shift attribute value in one of the patterns, although

[Bug target/64460] ARM ICE on valid code

2015-01-09 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug target/64460] ARM ICE on valid code

2015-01-09 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/64460] ARM ICE on valid code

2015-01-09 Thread joel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460 --- Comment #4 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #3) I have a fix in the works. The bug is down to the shift attribute value in one of the patterns, although only xscale_sched_adjust_cost uses

[Bug target/64460] ARM ICE on valid code

2015-01-03 Thread joel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460 --- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org --- I ran a git bisect and it didn't narrow it down much but I hope this helps. After the list of candidates, I am posting the full git bisect log. Bisecting: 27 revisions left to test