https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yep, this seems resonable patch to me. It is OK if it passes testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
this is the testcase from ardour3:
$ g++ -c -g -O3 -fPIC track3.ii
track3.ii: In member function 'void F::apply(void (Track::*)(T, void*), T,
void*) [with T = bool]':
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
--- Comment #10 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34909
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34909action=edit
test case for aarch64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-linux-gnueabihf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
--- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
FWIW, I also ran valgrind on cc1plus just for good measure, to see if we were
hitting some uninitialized memory issues, but I came out empty handed:
reynosa:/dev/shm/t/gcc$ valgrind
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
No.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
does adding -fstack-protector-strong make a difference?
15 matches
Mail list logo
