https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
--- Comment #29 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
BTW, there is still one unresolved known problem which can silently generate
wrong code: PR 56451
Although the testsuite FAIL might have disappeared, the issue hasn't been
actually
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
--- Comment #30 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Tue May 26 22:32:11 2015
New Revision: 223721
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223721root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65979
* config/sh/sh.md (tstsi_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
--- Comment #31 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Tue May 26 22:37:06 2015
New Revision: 223722
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223722root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65979
* config/sh/sh.md (tstsi_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
--- Comment #28 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de ---
It doesn't bootstrap because the D compiler fails the compare test. This
happens both on gcc-4.8 and gcc-4.9, here's the excerpt from 4.8 [1]:
Comparing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
--- Comment #27 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #25)
So, if I understand correctly ...
- 4.9.something doesn't bootstrap because of something unknown
It doesn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Multiple issues in |[4.9/5/6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
--- Comment #25 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #24)
I am partially to be blamed for that. I initially reported the gcc-5 issue
here, then saw gcc-4.9 failed to build as well
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
--- Comment #24 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #23)
Ouch. The peephole in problem was added at gcc-5 not at 4.9. The above
patch should fix the original
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
--- Comment #23 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ouch. The peephole in problem was added at gcc-5 not at 4.9. The above
patch should fix the original conftest.c issue, but debien 4.9-16 problem
would be an another issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
--- Comment #26 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #25)
So, if I understand correctly ...
- 4.9.something doesn't bootstrap because of something unknown
- 5.something doesn't bootstrap
10 matches
Mail list logo
