[Bug target/66874] RFE: x86_64_fallback_frame_state more robust

2024-02-26 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66874 --- Comment #6 from Sam James --- Pretty sure my issue is indeed PR114116.

[Bug target/66874] RFE: x86_64_fallback_frame_state more robust

2024-02-23 Thread schwab--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66874 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- If the unwinder crashes you have either incorrect unwind info or a corrupted stack. Neither should be papered over.

[Bug target/66874] RFE: x86_64_fallback_frame_state more robust

2024-02-23 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66874 --- Comment #4 from Sam James --- I was just going off "incorrect debug info" in comment 0 given it's the only thing I changed recently. If not, then I've got no idea. If I were sure it were dwz, I'd file a bug there ;)

[Bug target/66874] RFE: x86_64_fallback_frame_state more robust

2024-02-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66874 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/66874] RFE: x86_64_fallback_frame_state more robust

2024-02-23 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66874 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2