https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68018
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68018
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Oct 22 06:52:00 2015
New Revision: 229162
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229162=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2015-10-21 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68018
--- Comment #5 from Zdenek Sojka ---
I did a test run with r229094 + the patch applied, and there are no ICEs. All
the ICEs archived from older runs are gone, and no new ones are introduced (eg.
everything that failed in the past now compiles
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68018
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Oct 21 08:43:44 2015
New Revision: 229120
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229120=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/68018
* config/i386/i386.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68018
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #2)
> I am also seeing this (or another in ix86_compute_frame_layout) ICE when
> running the gfortran testsuite. Again with -mstackrealing. I will post the
> testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68018
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68018
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Some parts of gcc still assume that MS_ABI stack is always aligned to 128bits.
Proposed patch:
--cut here--
@@ -11283,7 +11296,8 @@ ix86_compute_frame_layout (struct ix86_frame *fram
function prologues
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68018
--- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka ---
I am also seeing this (or another in ix86_compute_frame_layout) ICE when
running the gfortran testsuite. Again with -mstackrealing. I will post the
testcase when I get home.
