https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
Bug 68945 depends on bug 70595, which changed state.
Bug 70595 Summary: Cilk Plus testsuite needs massive cleanup
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70595
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
--- Comment #14 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Thu Dec 1 14:48:49 2016
New Revision: 243112
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243112=gcc=rev
Log:
Import libcilkrts Build 4467 (PR target/68945)
PR target/68945
Merge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
--- Comment #13 from Rainer Orth ---
I see my patch has been applied upstream. Thanks for that.
It would be really great if it could be imported into the gcc tree for the
GCC 7 release, either before stage 1 closes or, release managers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ---
[...]
>> * One thing I wonder about is runtime/config/sparc/os-fence.h: when using
>> __sync_synchronize, gcc emits membar #StoreLoad, while
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ---
> * In runtime/config/sparc/os-unix-sysdep.c (__cilkrts_getticks) I needed
> different
> 32- and 64-bit versions. I tested the result in standalone program which
> just
> printed the result.
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38221|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
--- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 38413
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38413=edit
sparcv9 support patch
This patch (on top of the previous one) fixes the sparcv9 failures reported
before.
As I'd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #7 from Stefan Teleman ---
>> Since Stefan hasn't followed up and I'm currently looking at other
>> libcilkrts issues anyway, I'm taking over from here.
>
> Had every
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
--- Comment #7 from Stefan Teleman ---
> Since Stefan hasn't followed up and I'm currently looking at other
> libcilkrts issues anyway, I'm taking over from here.
Had every intention to follow-up with a cleaned-up patch, but did not find
the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37050|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
--- Comment #3 from Stefan Teleman ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #2)
> Patches need to be posted on the gcc-patches@ mailing-list.
>
> A few remarks:
>
> - SPARC is not a platform/target, only an architecture, so I presume that
15 matches
Mail list logo
