https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69040
--- Comment #13 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #12)
Sorry for the double comments, looks like I have issued with Chrome on top of
all.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69040
--- Comment #12 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Sudip from comment #10)
> So you are suggesting to bisect trunk and
> build gcc and then use that gcc to compile cris allmodconfig to see if that
> bisect was good or bad?
That's what
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69040
--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Sudip from comment #10)
> So you are suggesting to bisect trunk and
> build gcc and then use that gcc to compile cris allmodconfig to see if that
> bisect was good or bad?
That's what
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69040
--- Comment #10 from Sudip ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #9)
> Sorry, this is a reload bug and I can't give it my undivided attention
> within the coming month.
>
> My top-of-the-head solution hypothesis (i.e. what I'd try
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69040
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Sorry, this is a reload bug and I can't give it my undivided attention within
the coming month.
Reload ties itself in a knot and calls back into the movdi expander asking it
to reload a in=(reg:DI 11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69040
--- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Supposedly viable workarounds: omit "-fno-omit-frame-pointer" or use "-O2".
(required and necessary options for observation; omitting any of the
"-f"-options compiles succcessfully: "-Os -march=v10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69040
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
This is a regression for the gcc-5 branch compared to the gcc-4_9-branch at
r233942 (not seeing the error for the same options as observed on the
gcc-5-branch).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69040
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69040
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69040
--- Comment #5 from Sudip ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #4)
> (In reply to Sudip from comment #3)
> > A gentle ping..
> > Any idea when this might get resolved.
> >
> > regards
> > sudip
>
> I thought I'd get to it this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69040
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Sudip from comment #3)
> A gentle ping..
> Any idea when this might get resolved.
>
> regards
> sudip
I thought I'd get to it this week, but didn't. Maybe the next week.
Thanks for your
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69040
--- Comment #3 from Sudip ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #2)
> Thanks for the holiday gift. :)
> (Thanks for entering a report.)
A gentle ping..
Any idea when this might get resolved.
regards
sudip
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69040
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69040
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
14 matches
Mail list logo
