https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69789
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Markwalder ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> (In reply to Thomas Markwalder from comment #5)
> > A bit more digging reveals that in the logic expression which fails:
> >
> > {{{
> > // Check if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69789
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Thomas Markwalder from comment #5)
> A bit more digging reveals that in the logic expression which fails:
>
> {{{
> // Check if we need to run the operation again.
> if (ec ==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69789
Tomek Mrugalski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spam.gcc at klub dot com.pl
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69789
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Markwalder ---
A bit more digging reveals that in the logic expression which fails:
{{{
// Check if we need to run the operation again.
if (ec == boost::asio::error::would_block
|| ec ==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69789
Tomek Mrugalski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thomson at klub dot com.pl
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69789
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Markwalder ---
After further analysis we've discovered that the optimizer does not remove the
tests, it alters the comparison of (ec == enumerated value). If one replaces
the "ec" with "ec.value()" in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69789
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This works in GCC 6 on aarch64 as far as I can tell.
