https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69841
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69841
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #5)
> I don't know enough about the C++ standard to know whether this patch is
> reasonable to backport to GCC 5. Jason, do you have an opinion?
I'd be pretty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69841
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69841
--- Comment #5 from James Greenhalgh ---
I don't know enough about the C++ standard to know whether this patch is
reasonable to backport to GCC 5. Jason, do you have an opinion?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69841
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69841
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alan.lawrence at arm dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69841
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jgreenhalgh at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69841
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
