https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
--- Comment #17 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Feb 17 16:35:37 2017
New Revision: 245537
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245537=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/76731
* config/i386/avx512fintrin.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
--- Comment #16 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Feb 16 16:41:36 2017
New Revision: 245509
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245509=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/76731
* config/i386/avx512fintrin.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Senkevich ---
Hi,
are these intrinsics needed to be backported?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
--- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jan 17 17:03:00 2017
New Revision: 244540
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244540=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/76731
* config/i386/avx512fintrin.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
Yulia Koval changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vaalfreja at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Senkevich ---
(In reply to Kirill Yukhin from comment #10)
> (In reply to Andrew Senkevich from comment #8)
> > I think we should follow here declarations from icc headers to be compatible
> > with it.
> Okay. Could
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
--- Comment #11 from Wenzel Jakob ---
Searching through the intrinsics guide (e.g.
https://software.intel.com/sites/landingpage/IntrinsicsGuide/#text=gather_ps),
I see "void *" for all gather scatter intrinsics and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
--- Comment #10 from Kirill Yukhin ---
(In reply to Andrew Senkevich from comment #8)
> I think we should follow here declarations from icc headers to be compatible
> with it.
Okay. Could you pls state which rules ICC follows for all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
--- Comment #9 from Wenzel Jakob ---
Hi -- just a ping regarding this issue.
Thanks,
Wenzel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
Andrew Senkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew.n.senkevich at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
--- Comment #6 from Wenzel Jakob ---
Are there any news here? This is clearly an issue, and it would be nice to fix
it. I currently can't compile my AVX512 project on GCC due to this bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Kyrill/Uros, is this something we should change?
Any comments on the #c1 questions?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
--- Comment #4 from Wenzel Jakob ---
Hmm, it looks like this is still an issue. Recompiling my codebase with the
latest trunk version of gcc still produces many errors caused by this, e.g.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
--- Comment #3 from Wenzel Jakob ---
Any updates here? Should this be closed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
--- Comment #2 from Wenzel Jakob ---
+1 this looks great!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
18 matches
Mail list logo