[Bug target/77761] [7 Regression] wrong code with -fschedule-insns -mavx512f --param=max-pending-list-length=512

2016-12-07 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77761 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/77761] [7 Regression] wrong code with -fschedule-insns -mavx512f --param=max-pending-list-length=512

2016-12-07 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77761 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- Author: vmakarov Date: Tue Dec 6 20:02:03 2016 New Revision: 243316 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243316=gcc=rev Log: 2016-12-06 Vladimir Makarov target/77761

[Bug target/77761] [7 Regression] wrong code with -fschedule-insns -mavx512f --param=max-pending-list-length=512

2016-12-02 Thread vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77761 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov --- Thanks for reporting this, Zdenek. After some time staring at the generated code I believe the problem is in hard register splitting optimization. LRA uses wrongly smaller mode for splitting than

[Bug target/77761] [7 Regression] wrong code with -fschedule-insns -mavx512f --param=max-pending-list-length=512

2016-11-21 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77761 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug target/77761] [7 Regression] wrong code with -fschedule-insns -mavx512f --param=max-pending-list-length=512

2016-11-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77761 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/77761] [7 Regression] wrong code with -fschedule-insns -mavx512f --param=max-pending-list-length=512

2016-09-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77761 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0