[Bug target/81485] [SH] ICE: in sh_find_set_of_reg, at config/sh/sh-protos.h:232

2018-01-21 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81485] [SH] ICE: in sh_find_set_of_reg, at config/sh/sh-protos.h:232

2018-01-21 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485 --- Comment #10 from Oleg Endo --- Author: olegendo Date: Sun Jan 21 13:00:51 2018 New Revision: 256930 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256930&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/81485 * config/sh/sh-protos.h (sh_find_set_of_re

[Bug target/81485] [SH] ICE: in sh_find_set_of_reg, at config/sh/sh-protos.h:232

2017-12-06 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485 --- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #8) > > Should we mark this as resolved? No, because it has not been resolved for GCC 6.

[Bug target/81485] [SH] ICE: in sh_find_set_of_reg, at config/sh/sh-protos.h:232

2017-12-06 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485 --- Comment #8 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- This particular bug does no longer reproduce with gcc-7_7.2.0, the package builds fine with gcc-7: gcc-6: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=totem-pl-parser&arch=sh4&ver=3.10.8-3&s

[Bug target/81485] [SH] ICE: in sh_find_set_of_reg, at config/sh/sh-protos.h:232

2017-08-10 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485 --- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #6) > And in fact, there has been a change to the function sh_find_set_of_reg. > I'd have to dig through the archives etc to find out what was going on > there. The change wa

[Bug target/81485] [SH] ICE: in sh_find_set_of_reg, at config/sh/sh-protos.h:232

2017-08-10 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485 --- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo --- And in fact, there has been a change to the function sh_find_set_of_reg. I'd have to dig through the archives etc to find out what was going on there. Meanwhile, it seems that the small backport patch below fix

[Bug target/81485] [SH] ICE: in sh_find_set_of_reg, at config/sh/sh-protos.h:232

2017-08-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug target/81485] [SH] ICE: in sh_find_set_of_reg, at config/sh/sh-protos.h:232

2017-08-10 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485 --- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > > Good, I can confirm it works for GCC 5. Let's then bisect that.. I'm not sure whether this will reveal anything useful. It's probably just a bug in the function sh

[Bug target/81485] [SH] ICE: in sh_find_set_of_reg, at config/sh/sh-protos.h:232

2017-08-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---

[Bug target/81485] [SH] ICE: in sh_find_set_of_reg, at config/sh/sh-protos.h:232

2017-08-10 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-08-08 00:00:00 |2017-8-10 --- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo ---

[Bug target/81485] [SH] ICE: in sh_find_set_of_reg, at config/sh/sh-protos.h:232

2017-08-08 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|