https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82411
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82411
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Mar 27 23:28:25 2018
New Revision: 258909
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258909&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: -mreadonly-in-sdata (PR82411)
This adds a new option -mread
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82411
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Mar 27 23:13:02 2018
New Revision: 258907
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258907&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: -mreadonly-in-sdata (PR82411)
This adds a new option -mread
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82411
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82411
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Mar 7 20:27:11 2018
New Revision: 258340
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258340&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: -mreadonly-in-sdata (PR82411)
This adds a new option -mread
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82411
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #5 from Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82411
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|Powerpc*-*-*|powerpc*-*-*
--- Comment #4 from Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82411
--- Comment #3 from Kees Cook ---
To clarify, using -mno-sdata means all things are removed from sdata, not just
const, yes? I'd like to be able to leave writable stuff there, to avoid any
additional performance penalty.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82411
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82411
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Actually it is just undefined what happens when a write to a const variable.
So a trap or the write happened for a const both are valid thing.
Now const really should be put in the read only section if pos
10 matches
Mail list logo