https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85323
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85323
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 17 10:07:12 2018
New Revision: 260313
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260313&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85323
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_fold_builtin):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85323
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 17 10:01:33 2018
New Revision: 260312
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260312&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85323
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_fold_builtin):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85323
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 17 09:54:36 2018
New Revision: 260311
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260311&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85323
* config/i386/i386.c: Include tree-vector-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85323
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85323
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If you mean adding if (__builtin_constant_p (__B) && __B == 0) return __A; and
similar to all the various intrinsics, then that is not the right thing to do,
it will make the headers much larger and even the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85323
Julia Koval changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||julia.koval at intel dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85323
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85323
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Kretz ---
Created attachment 43898
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43898&action=edit
idea for a partial solution
Constant propagation works using the built in shift operators. At least for the
sh
