[Bug target/86589] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-7-le.c and gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-7-be.c fail starting with r262440

2021-05-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86589 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX CC|

[Bug target/86589] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-7-le.c and gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-7-be.c fail starting with r262440

2020-03-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86589 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.4 |8.5 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/86589] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-7-le.c and gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-7-be.c fail starting with r262440

2019-02-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86589 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/86589] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-7-le.c and gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-7-be.c fail starting with r262440

2018-07-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86589 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.2 |8.3 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/86589] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-7-le.c and gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-7-be.c fail starting with r262440

2018-07-20 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86589 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I just checked and 8.1.0 was OK

[Bug target/86589] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-7-le.c and gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-7-be.c fail starting with r262440

2018-07-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86589 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization