[Bug target/90928] [9/10 Regression] [nvptx] internal compiler error: in instantiate_virtual_regs_in_insn, at function.c:1737

2020-08-13 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90928

Tom de Vries  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries  ---
Patch committed, marking resolved-fixed.

[Bug target/90928] [9/10 Regression] [nvptx] internal compiler error: in instantiate_virtual_regs_in_insn, at function.c:1737

2020-08-13 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90928

Tom de Vries  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|9.4 |11.0

[Bug target/90928] [9/10 Regression] [nvptx] internal compiler error: in instantiate_virtual_regs_in_insn, at function.c:1737

2020-03-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90928

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
GCC 9.3.0 has been released, adjusting target milestone.

[Bug target/90928] [9/10 Regression] [nvptx] internal compiler error: in instantiate_virtual_regs_in_insn, at function.c:1737

2019-10-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90928

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P4
   Target Milestone|--- |9.3

[Bug target/90928] [9/10 Regression] [nvptx] internal compiler error: in instantiate_virtual_regs_in_insn, at function.c:1737

2019-10-14 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90928

Thomas Schwinge  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2019-10-14
 CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
  Known to work||9.1.0
Version|10.0|9.2.0
Summary|[nvptx] internal compiler   |[9/10 Regression] [nvptx]
   |error: in   |internal compiler error: in
   |instantiate_virtual_regs_in |instantiate_virtual_regs_in
   |_insn, at function.c:1737   |_insn, at function.c:1737
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
  Known to fail||10.0, 9.2.0

--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge  ---
This appears on trunk in (r271346, r272643].

Same on gcc-9-branch in (r270842, r274274] (that's between 9.1 and 9.2).

So this could do with some more bi-secting.