https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91880
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Max Filippov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20c6c0c8b18ae1bb3582456085e98cb50ab5854a
commit r9-8500-g20c6c0c8b18ae1bb3582456085e98cb50ab5854a
Author: Max Filippov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91880
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Max Filippov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87c1bfebcdda50ff8964a07c9963823de43de65a
commit r8-10181-g87c1bfebcdda50ff8964a07c9963823de43de65a
Author: Max Filippov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91880
jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91880
--- Comment #4 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jcmvbkbc
Date: Thu Sep 26 20:51:27 2019
New Revision: 276166
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276166=gcc=rev
Log:
xtensa: fix PR target/91880
Xtensa hwloop_optimize segfaults when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91880
--- Comment #3 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> Do you have any guess how old is the issue?
I guess it's been there since gcc-5 when both call0 ABI support and HW loops
optimization were
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91880
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91880
--- Comment #1 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Minimal reproducer:
void f(unsigned int n, char *a, char *b)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i <= n - 1; ++i)
a[i] = b[i];
}
The issue is that entry_bb is empty in the
