https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92137
frankhb1989 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||frankhb1989 at gmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92137
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Ariel Torti from comment #6)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> > > Those are intrinsics and most of them are documented in the Intel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92137
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92137
--- Comment #6 from Ariel Torti ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> > Those are intrinsics and most of them are documented in the Intel
> > architecture manuals, or various web sites.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92137
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92137
Daniel Gutson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danielgutson at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92137
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92137
--- Comment #2 from Ariel Torti ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> You shouldn't use those, they are for internal use only. That's the reason
> they are not documented.
Yes, my mistake. I just read
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92137
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
