[Bug target/92791] [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 since r278645

2019-12-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92791 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/92791] [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 since r278645

2019-12-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92791 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Dec 5 09:04:24 2019 New Revision: 278989 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278989=gcc=rev Log: PR target/92791 * config/i386/i386.md (movstrict): Move test for

[Bug target/92791] [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 since r278645

2019-12-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92791 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- We have in the documentation: For a named pattern, the condition may not depend on the data in the insn being matched, but only the target-machine-type flags. The compiler needs to test these

[Bug target/92791] [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 since r278645

2019-12-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92791 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- So: struct S { S (void *a, bool b) : x (a), y (b) {} void *x; bool y; }; void bar (S); void foo (void *x) { S sbuf_it (x, x == nullptr); bar (sbuf_it); } with -O2 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=i586 gives the

[Bug target/92791] [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 since r278645

2019-12-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92791 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug target/92791] [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 since r278645

2019-12-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92791 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|