https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94892
--- Comment #4 from Gabriel Ravier ---
Harald, for the specific code you wrote, I now see this from GCC :
f(int):
test edi, edi
js .L2
jmp f1()
.L2:
jmp f2()
So for that specific code, GCC has improved, though for the original test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94892
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94892
--- Comment #2 from Gabriel Ravier ---
In that case, then, GCC is generating sub-optimal code for `(x >> 31) + 1`
alone since it optimises that to the same thing as LLVM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94892
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |target
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
