[Bug target/98550] [11 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2219 on s390x-linux-gnu

2021-01-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98550 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/98550] [11 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2219 on s390x-linux-gnu

2021-01-12 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98550 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52a170b1a1818b7521c25e76271638a448b3f630 commit r11-6613-g52a170b1a1818b7521c25e76271638a448b3f630 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug target/98550] [11 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2219 on s390x-linux-gnu

2021-01-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98550 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #49948|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/98550] [11 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2219 on s390x-linux-gnu

2021-01-12 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98550 --- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > I guess it should be a !multiple_p (group_size, nunits) check instead? Sounds plausible :-)

[Bug target/98550] [11 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2219 on s390x-linux-gnu

2021-01-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98550 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 49948 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49948=edit patch untested patch

[Bug target/98550] [11 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2219 on s390x-linux-gnu

2021-01-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98550 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/98550] [11 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2219 on s390x-linux-gnu

2021-01-12 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98550 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #5 from Andreas

[Bug target/98550] [11 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2219 on s390x-linux-gnu

2021-01-12 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98550 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel --- The problem occurs starting with: commit 1e1e1edf88a7c40ae4ae0de9e6077179e13ccf6d Author: Richard Biener Date: Thu Oct 29 08:48:15 2020 +0100 More BB vectorization tweaks This tweaks the op

[Bug target/98550] [11 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2219 on s390x-linux-gnu

2021-01-12 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98550 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel --- Created attachment 49944 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49944=edit Reduced testcase This testcase fails on bcb3065b2ba with cc1plus t.cpp -march=z13 -O3

[Bug target/98550] [11 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2219 on s390x-linux-gnu

2021-01-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98550 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug target/98550] [11 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2219 on s390x-linux-gnu

2021-01-05 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98550 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING Assignee|marxin at gcc

[Bug target/98550] [11 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2219 on s390x-linux-gnu

2021-01-05 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98550 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0