[Bug testsuite/114642] new test case gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-3.c from r14-6195-gb8cf266f4ca4ff fails for 32 bits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114642
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Faust :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:639215c5eb6c56ba3830cd868d1d3ddd700b4c90
commit r14-9878-g639215c5eb6c56ba3830cd868d1d3ddd700b4c90
Author: David Faust
Date: Mon Apr 8 13:33:48 2024 -0700
btf: improve btf-datasec-3.c test [PR114642]
This test failed on powerpc --target_board=unix'{-m32}' because two
variables were not placed in sections where the test silently (and
incorrectly) assumed they would be.
The important thing for the test is only that BTF_KIND_DATASEC entries
are NOT generated for the extern variable declarations without an
explicit section attribute. Make the test more robust by placing the
non-extern variables in explicit sections, and invert the checks to
more accurately verify what we care about in this test.
gcc/testsuite/
PR testsuite/114642
* gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-3.c: Make test more robust on
different
architectures.
[Bug testsuite/114642] new test case gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-3.c from r14-6195-gb8cf266f4ca4ff fails for 32 bits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114642 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #2) > David posted a fix (see URL). Oh yes that should fix it for MIPS and RISCV too.
[Bug testsuite/114642] new test case gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-3.c from r14-6195-gb8cf266f4ca4ff fails for 32 bits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114642 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma ||il/gcc-patches/2024-April/6 ||48994.html CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |david.faust at oracle dot com --- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin --- David posted a fix (see URL).
[Bug testsuite/114642] new test case gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-3.c from r14-6195-gb8cf266f4ca4ff fails for 32 bits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114642 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64-linux-gnu |powerpc-linux-gnu mips*-*-* ||riscv*-*-* See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=112849 Keywords||testsuite-fail Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2024-04-09 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Confirmed. This does seem like a testsuite issue. With `-G0` (which disables small data opt) the testcases passes. So I suspect this will also fail on mips*-*-* too. It also fails for riscv*-*-* (where the option to disable small data is -msmall-data-limit=0).
