--- Comment #8 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-07-29 21:02 ---
The patch discussed here was incorporated in mainline, and the failure was last
reported 20070420.
--
tprince at computer dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-01 07:59 ---
Subject: Bug 31589
Author: dorit
Date: Tue May 1 07:58:59 2007
New Revision: 124315
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=124315
Log:
PR testsuite/31589
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-iv-9.c:
--- Comment #5 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-04-27 17:02 ---
According to my test of Dorit's updated patch,
the following are now PASS:
vect-iv-9.c
vect-iv-4.c
pr30771.c
The patch changed FAIL to XFAIL for the following
vect-reduc-dot-u16b.c
vect-widen-mult-u16.c
--- Comment #6 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-04-27 23:56 ---
I retyped the xfail instruction after applying the patch, and now
gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-69.c
shows XFAIL as intended, with the patch Dorit posted yesterday.
My patch must have been corrupted with
--- Comment #4 from dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2007-04-27 05:44 ---
patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg01739.html
requires retesting on ia64 before I can commit it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31589
--- Comment #2 from dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2007-04-17 20:10 ---
2 more are under investigation:
no-section-anchors-vect-69.c
vect-reduc-dot-u16a.c
In the first testcase, the vectorizer can only prove that the data reference in
the third loop is aligned on 8 bytes. This is
--- Comment #3 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-04-18 02:21 ---
The patch which Dorit proposed does change the FAIL in the testsuite case
vect-reduc-dot-u16a.c to XFAIL, according to my test.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31589
