[Bug testsuite/38949] Link failures in new stackalign tests

2009-01-31 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-31 17:44 --- Fixed. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug testsuite/38949] Link failures in new stackalign tests

2009-01-26 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-26 20:34 --- Subject: Bug 38949 Author: hjl Date: Mon Jan 26 20:34:09 2009 New Revision: 143684 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=143684 Log: 2009-01-26 Danny Smith dannysm...@users.sourceforge.net PR

[Bug testsuite/38949] Link failures in new stackalign tests

2009-01-23 Thread dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com 2009-01-23 18:10 --- Created an attachment (id=17168) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17168action=view) Force assembler labels to match. Now testing this fairly straightforward approach to making the

[Bug testsuite/38949] Link failures in new stackalign tests

2009-01-23 Thread dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #2 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-01-23 18:53 --- There is an alternative patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-10/msg00044.html which i had forgotten about. It has been tested on i686-pc-mingw32 and i686-pc-linux --

[Bug testsuite/38949] Link failures in new stackalign tests

2009-01-23 Thread dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com 2009-01-23 19:02 --- Right you are. Either one should work, but I don't have any more spare time than you for testing things on Linux right now. It's non-critical, so I'll keep a patch in my local tree and maybe we should