[Bug testsuite/56194] FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not rodata
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56194 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Fri Jan 15 12:53:00 2016 New Revision: 232422 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232422=gcc=rev Log: S/390: const9.C: Disable test. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog PR c++/56194 * g++.dg/init/const9.C: Disable test on S/390. Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/const9.C
[Bug testsuite/56194] FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not rodata
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56194 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Sep 6 21:45:53 2014 New Revision: 214996 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214996root=gccview=rev Log: PR testsuite/56194 * g++.dg/init/const9.C: Skip scan-assembler-not rodata on hppa*-*-*. Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/const9.C
[Bug testsuite/56194] FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not rodata
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56194 --- Comment #5 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Sep 6 21:50:40 2014 New Revision: 214997 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214997root=gccview=rev Log: PR testsuite/56194 * g++.dg/init/const9.C: Skip scan-assembler-not rodata on hppa*-*-*. Modified: branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/const9.C
[Bug testsuite/56194] FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not rodata
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56194 --- Comment #6 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Sep 6 21:53:14 2014 New Revision: 214998 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214998root=gccview=rev Log: PR testsuite/56194 * g++.dg/init/const9.C: Skip scan-assembler-not rodata on hppa*-*-*. Modified: branches/gcc-4_8-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_8-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/const9.C
[Bug testsuite/56194] FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not rodata
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56194 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #7 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed.
[Bug testsuite/56194] FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not rodata
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56194 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2013-02-04 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 09:41:58 UTC --- Or rather made be more specific in some way ...
[Bug testsuite/56194] FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not rodata
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56194 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 09:46:49 UTC --- Or if not easily possible, just disable the dg-final test on targets where it won't work. xfail is wrong here, there is no error that is expected, due to the fn descriptor it might simply be not (easily) testable on that target.
[Bug testsuite/56194] FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not rodata
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56194 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-02-04 16:03:08 UTC --- One thought I had is to add the -fpic option. This should push the function descriptor into .data.