[Bug testsuite/58645] FAIL: gnat.dg/specs/linker_alias.ads (test for errors, line 6)

2013-10-12 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58645 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Sure, but you can just skip the testcase like on Darwin. It is not! I was about to open a PR for it: On x86_64-apple-darwin(10|12) gnat.dg/specs/linker_section.ads fails,

[Bug testsuite/58645] FAIL: gnat.dg/specs/linker_alias.ads (test for errors, line 6)

2013-10-12 Thread charlet at adacore dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58645 --- Comment #3 from charlet at adacore dot com charlet at adacore dot com --- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58645 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Sure, but you can just skip the testcase

Re: [Bug testsuite/58645] FAIL: gnat.dg/specs/linker_alias.ads (test for errors, line 6)

2013-10-12 Thread Arnaud Charlet
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58645 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Sure, but you can just skip the testcase like on Darwin. It is not! I was about to open a PR for it: Actually the new output is as expected since types are now

[Bug testsuite/58645] FAIL: gnat.dg/specs/linker_alias.ads (test for errors, line 6)

2013-10-12 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58645 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- It is not! I was about to open a PR for it: On x86_64-apple-darwin(10|12) gnat.dg/specs/linker_section.ads fails, It is, you're confusing 2 different tests here.

[Bug testsuite/58645] FAIL: gnat.dg/specs/linker_alias.ads (test for errors, line 6)

2013-10-08 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58645 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1