http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58645
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Sure, but you can just skip the testcase like on Darwin.
It is not! I was about to open a PR for it:
On x86_64-apple-darwin(10|12) gnat.dg/specs/linker_section.ads fails,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58645
--- Comment #3 from charlet at adacore dot com charlet at adacore dot com ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58645
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Sure, but you can just skip the testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58645
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Sure, but you can just skip the testcase like on Darwin.
It is not! I was about to open a PR for it:
Actually the new output is as expected since types are now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58645
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It is not! I was about to open a PR for it:
On x86_64-apple-darwin(10|12) gnat.dg/specs/linker_section.ads fails,
It is, you're confusing 2 different tests here.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58645
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1