[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-06-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #30 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4506b349cf527834239554a03e43ae45237b315c commit r11-10880-g4506b349cf527834239554a03e43ae45237b315c Author: Thomas

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-06-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #31 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91955e374e07dc8ee9111eeb49c137c5582ed674 commit r11-10881-g91955e374e07dc8ee9111eeb49c137c5582ed674 Author: Thomas

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-06-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #29 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e1bd4f5434d7989d723188e9f2b524ce234bc44d commit r11-10879-ge1bd4f5434d7989d723188e9f2b524ce234bc44d Author: Rainer Orth

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-06-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #28 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b4561b782427cdfe0fac1a869e79a49187817ffe commit r12-9739-gb4561b782427cdfe0fac1a869e79a49187817ffe Author: Thomas

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-06-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #27 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c6515076f2ba55a31149085d3826e975c114fe5 commit r12-9738-g5c6515076f2ba55a31149085d3826e975c114fe5 Author: Thomas

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-06-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #26 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:66df913899d32e7726f986afb61c5c5615eb2a36 commit r12-9737-g66df913899d32e7726f986afb61c5c5615eb2a36 Author: Rainer Orth

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-06-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #25 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09124b7ed7709721e86556b4083ef40925d7489b commit r13-7495-g09124b7ed7709721e86556b4083ef40925d7489b Author: Thomas

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-06-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #24 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3840d5ccf750b6a059258be7faa4a3fce85a6fa6 commit r13-7494-g3840d5ccf750b6a059258be7faa4a3fce85a6fa6 Author: Thomas

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-06-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #23 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2aa6135efb2d5fce93578592d91f8ce19a1b983b commit r13-7493-g2aa6135efb2d5fce93578592d91f8ce19a1b983b Author: Rainer Orth

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-06-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek --- Ok, but please do it sooner than later, so there is enough time before 13.2rc to note potential issues on the branch.

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-06-23 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #21 from Thomas Schwinge --- Jakub, given that 'libgomp is usually the “long tail” of [...] testing' (GCC IRC, 2023-06-05), Iain has asked that I backport to release branches the changes implemented here: - commit

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-06-05 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #20 from Thomas Schwinge --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #19) > (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #18) > > r14-1490-g04abe1944d30eb18a2060cfcd9695d085f7b4752 "Support parallel > > testing in libgomp: fallback Perl

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-06-02 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #19

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-06-02 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #18 from Thomas Schwinge --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from ) > I am also somewhat puzzled by what conditions I need to take advantage of > the parallel running? > Darwin has

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-06-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04abe1944d30eb18a2060cfcd9695d085f7b4752 commit r14-1490-g04abe1944d30eb18a2060cfcd9695d085f7b4752 Author: Thomas Schwinge

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-05-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- Another possibility would be pick up one runtest (e.g. the first one using O_EXCL which creates some file) and let it perform all executions from that point on instead of doing the compilations, where the

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-05-16 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #14 from Thomas Schwinge --- > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #12) >> Note that there's a gnulib module for flock: >>

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-05-15 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #14 from Thomas Schwinge --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #12) > Note that there's a gnulib module for flock: > https://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/html_node/flock.html I'd see that one -- but it also says: "the

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-05-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- And fcntl in tclx. Anyway, I think choosing between flock(1) and some python file locking would be better than using perl which is only needed in maintainer mode and not otherwise.

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-05-15 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #12 from Eric Gallager --- Note that there's a gnulib module for flock: https://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/html_node/flock.html

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-05-15 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Schwinge --- (In reply to myself from comment #10) > Could we easily build a portable 'flock'-like using 'fcntl' locking > primitives? (, for example.)

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-05-15 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-05-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- r5-3553 uses if {![catch {open $path {RDWR CREAT EXCL} 0600} fd]} { to determine which make check invocation should be given a particular batch of tests (in an initially empty directory), could you use that

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-05-15 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #7 from Thomas Schwinge --- > Resolved for GCC 14. Not planning on backporting to release branches (but > could, if desired). Unfortunately not: flock is completely

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

2023-05-15 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED