https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90812
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90812
--- Comment #3 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> I think most tests like this end up using 'long long' and use
> __SIZEOF_LONG_LONG__ to guard code. There's a dejagnu effective target for
> long long
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90812
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
I think most tests like this end up using 'long long' and use
__SIZEOF_LONG_LONG__ to guard code. There's a dejagnu effective target for
long long support.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90812
--- Comment #1 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
To check for 64-bit integer support, it seems that the "stdint_types" effective
target keyword should be sufficient, although I'm not sure if it might be
possible for a target to provide __INT64_TYPE__
