[Bug testsuite/91458] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr19807.C -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump-times optimized "\\\\[\\\\(void .\\\\) \\\\+ 8B\\\\]" 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91458 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Aug 21 02:18:41 2019 New Revision: 274764 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274764=gcc=rev Log: PR testsuite/91458 gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dse-1.C: Use the same search pattern unconditionally (correcting r272199, PR middle-end/90676). * gcc.dg/tree-prof/stringop-2.c: Same. Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dse-1.C trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/stringop-2.c
[Bug testsuite/91458] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr19807.C -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump-times optimized "\\\\[\\\\(void .\\\\) \\\\+ 8B\\\\]" 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91458
--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2019-08-15 10:47 a.m., danglin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Similar fail:
> FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dse-1.C scan-tree-dump-times dse1
> "MEM[(struct FixBuf *)& + [0-9]+B] = {}" 1
>
> Here we have:
> MEM [(struct FixBuf *)& + 28B] = {};
This test fails for the same reason as pr19807.C. I noticed this morning that
gcc.dg/tree-prof/stringop-2.c
also fails for same reason:
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/stringop-2.c scan-tree-dump optimized "MEM[(void
.)] = 168430090"
Here we have the following in optimized tree dump:
MEM [(void *)] = 168430090;
[Bug testsuite/91458] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr19807.C -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump-times optimized "\\\\[\\\\(void .\\\\) \\\\+ 8B\\\\]" 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91458 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- I've made the change in r274574.
[Bug testsuite/91458] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr19807.C -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump-times optimized "\\\\[\\\\(void .\\\\) \\\\+ 8B\\\\]" 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91458 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Fri Aug 16 15:47:25 2019 New Revision: 274574 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274574=gcc=rev Log: PR testsuite/91458 gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr19807.C: Use the same search pattern unconditionally (correcting r272199, PR middle-end/90676). Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr19807.C
[Bug testsuite/91458] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr19807.C -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump-times optimized "\\\\[\\\\(void .\\\\) \\\\+ 8B\\\\]" 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91458 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Let me fix it.
[Bug testsuite/91458] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr19807.C -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump-times optimized "\\\\[\\\\(void .\\\\) \\\\+ 8B\\\\]" 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91458
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2019-08-16
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
I think it's just a mistake in the pattern:
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "\\\[\\\(void .\\\) \\\+ 8B\\\]" 3
"optimized" { target { ! store_merge } } } }
{ dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " \\\[\\\(void .\\\) \\\+
8B\\\]" 3 "optimized" { target { store_merge } } } } */
No store merging takes place here so the test should use the second pattern
unconditionally.
[Bug testsuite/91458] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr19807.C -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump-times optimized "\\\\[\\\\(void .\\\\) \\\\+ 8B\\\\]" 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91458 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Component|tree-optimization |testsuite --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Martin changed the dumping
