https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103724
--- Comment #7 from Frank Heckenbach ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> (In reply to Frank Heckenbach from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> > > One thing we could do is annotate struct loop * with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103724
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Frank Heckenbach from comment #5)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> > One thing we could do is annotate struct loop * with the (high level)
> > optimizations we've applied so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103724
--- Comment #5 from Frank Heckenbach ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> One thing we could do is annotate struct loop * with the (high level)
> optimizations we've applied so that when we emit this warning we could say
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103724
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103724
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103724
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
